web analytics
service and gratitude

liturgy RSS feed liturgy on twitter liturgy facebook

Jesus “the son of Mary” Mark 6:3

Mary and Jesus

Last Sunday’s Gospel reading (Mark 6:1-13) had many fascinating moments that caused us to think again. I want to pause with Mark 6:3

Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary

Firstly, Mark never mentions Jesus’ father. Secondly, Luke 4:22 and Matthew 13:55 read “the son of Joseph” and “the son of the carpenter”. Thirdly, it is notable that this is the only verse in the Bible where Jesus is described as being a carpenter.

Here are five options, which may overlap, in interpreting this unique designation of Jesus as “the son of Mary”:

Mark may be trying to stress the human characteristics of Jesus in response to a Jesus is “God only” view of his audience (Docetism).

Joseph is not mentioned because Mary is his only human parent. Hence, this is hinting at the virginal conception of Jesus. Normally, one would have been called “son of [a man]”. The unusual nature of a “son of [a woman]” was code for early Christians by which they understood that Jesus lacked a human father.

The villagers intended the comment as a slur and Mark simply reported it. The villagers were implying Jesus was illegitimate.

The phrase was simply the most natural way to refer to Jesus because Mary was more well known (either to the villagers or Mark’s audience), possibly because Joseph was long dead. There are arguments that “son of [a woman]” was the normal way to refer to children of widows.

Mark didn’t write the text as we now have it. There was textual corruption either through scribal error or to avoid conflicting with the by-then-wider-known virginal conception story. There are textual variants of Mark 6:3 which read ὁ τοῦ τέκτονος υἱός καὶ τῆς Μαρίας “the son of the carpenter and Mary” instead of ὁ τέκτων ὁ υἱὸς τῆς Μαρίας “the carpenter, son of Mary”.

In short, we are not sure why this unusual phrase “the son of Mary” is used here in Mark – there are several theories, including that the phrase as we have it isn’t what Mark wrote. What do you think? Are there other options missed here?

If you appreciated this post, do remember to like the liturgy facebook page, use the RSS feed, and sign up for a not-very-often email, …

Similar Posts:

Share

4 Responses to Jesus “the son of Mary” Mark 6:3

  1. Are there other options missed here?

    How would the author of Mark accurately know the content of dialog that they were not present to witness?

    • Oddly, David – this connects with a book review I’m working on which should appear here within a week or so 🙂 Blessings.

  2. On the face of it, the locals are both astounded and offended by Jesus – the old “tall poppy” syndrome. Their remarks which precede the “Son of Mary” tag tend, to me (and other commentators, of course!) to suggest that the label is a slur. Surely a prophet should have a better pedigree! My sermon (linked below) was entitled “No skiting!”

Leave a reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.




About This Site Welcome to this ecumenical website of resources and reflections on liturgy, spirituality, and worship for individuals and communities. It is run by Rev. Bosco Peters.

You are visitor number shopify analytics tool since the launch of this site on Maundy Thursday, 13 April 2006