<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Lectionary (part 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liturgy.co.nz/lectionary-1/1216/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liturgy.co.nz/lectionary-1/1216</link>
	<description>Worship that works - spirituality that connects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:35:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Worley</title>
		<link>http://liturgy.co.nz/lectionary-1/1216#comment-11047</link>
		<dc:creator>George Worley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 04:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liturgy.co.nz/blog/?p=1216#comment-11047</guid>
		<description>James,

The RCL spreads the reading of the Bible over 3 years, if you attend church every Sunday you will have about 95 percent of the Bible read to you.  It also insures that if you go to another church that you would be hearing the same biblical readings that you would of heard at your home church... the RCL is an attempt to do just what Jesus prayed about... the church to be one.   The only drawback to the RCL that I have seen is not using the &quot;Books of Wisdom&quot; or &quot;Apocrypha&quot; also called the &quot;Deuterocanonical Books&quot; that we used before (us Episcopalians in the states used them and still do in our Daily Offices while most Protestants don&#039;t)... sometimes our rector will use them on Sunday especially if the reading is from Ester, he will use the Greek based text instead of the Hebrew based text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>The RCL spreads the reading of the Bible over 3 years, if you attend church every Sunday you will have about 95 percent of the Bible read to you.  It also insures that if you go to another church that you would be hearing the same biblical readings that you would of heard at your home church&#8230; the RCL is an attempt to do just what Jesus prayed about&#8230; the church to be one.   The only drawback to the RCL that I have seen is not using the &#8220;Books of Wisdom&#8221; or &#8220;Apocrypha&#8221; also called the &#8220;Deuterocanonical Books&#8221; that we used before (us Episcopalians in the states used them and still do in our Daily Offices while most Protestants don&#8217;t)&#8230; sometimes our rector will use them on Sunday especially if the reading is from Ester, he will use the Greek based text instead of the Hebrew based text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bosco Peters</title>
		<link>http://liturgy.co.nz/lectionary-1/1216#comment-5639</link>
		<dc:creator>Bosco Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liturgy.co.nz/blog/?p=1216#comment-5639</guid>
		<description>Interesting thoughts, thanks James. βιβλίου in Rev 22:19 in this context means a scroll and refers to the &quot;book/scroll&quot; of Revelation - the book, as you are using the word, was not really in currency yet, was it. At the time of the writing of Revelation, which books/scrolls would form the Christian Scriptures had not even been clarified. Here&#039;s a good experiment for you: for three years record the texts read aloud in your church &quot;as the Spirit directs&quot; and then compare that to the amount of scripture read in churches following the three readings and psalm of the RCL Sunday by Sunday. Looking forward to the result of your research in three years time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thoughts, thanks James. βιβλίου in Rev 22:19 in this context means a scroll and refers to the &#8220;book/scroll&#8221; of Revelation &#8211; the book, as you are using the word, was not really in currency yet, was it. At the time of the writing of Revelation, which books/scrolls would form the Christian Scriptures had not even been clarified. Here&#8217;s a good experiment for you: for three years record the texts read aloud in your church &#8220;as the Spirit directs&#8221; and then compare that to the amount of scripture read in churches following the three readings and psalm of the RCL Sunday by Sunday. Looking forward to the result of your research in three years time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James King</title>
		<link>http://liturgy.co.nz/lectionary-1/1216#comment-5638</link>
		<dc:creator>James King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liturgy.co.nz/blog/?p=1216#comment-5638</guid>
		<description>The Lectionary is not a gift of the Holy Spirit, but rather a wicked attempt to prevent most of the Holy Bible from ever being preached.  Who is to say what are the &quot;more significant&quot; passages of the Holy Bible.  Christian Scriptures end with the warning &quot;if anyone takes away from the book of this prophecy God will take away that person&#039;s share in the tree of life and in the holy city which are described in this book.  At the end of the 3rd chapter of 2nd Timothy Paul writes that &quot;All scripture is inspired by God and is useful ....&quot;  Let&#039;s preach the whole Word of God as the Spirit directs us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lectionary is not a gift of the Holy Spirit, but rather a wicked attempt to prevent most of the Holy Bible from ever being preached.  Who is to say what are the &#8220;more significant&#8221; passages of the Holy Bible.  Christian Scriptures end with the warning &#8220;if anyone takes away from the book of this prophecy God will take away that person&#8217;s share in the tree of life and in the holy city which are described in this book.  At the end of the 3rd chapter of 2nd Timothy Paul writes that &#8220;All scripture is inspired by God and is useful &#8230;.&#8221;  Let&#8217;s preach the whole Word of God as the Spirit directs us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RuthAnn</title>
		<link>http://liturgy.co.nz/lectionary-1/1216#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>RuthAnn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liturgy.co.nz/blog/?p=1216#comment-907</guid>
		<description>Just a quick notice - don&#039;t forget to include Lutherans - we use the lectionary, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick notice &#8211; don&#8217;t forget to include Lutherans &#8211; we use the lectionary, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bosco Peters</title>
		<link>http://liturgy.co.nz/lectionary-1/1216#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>Bosco Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liturgy.co.nz/blog/?p=1216#comment-859</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for that suggestion - I&#039;ve ordered my copy :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for that suggestion &#8211; I&#8217;ve ordered my copy <img src='http://liturgy.co.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RevJATB</title>
		<link>http://liturgy.co.nz/lectionary-1/1216#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>RevJATB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liturgy.co.nz/blog/?p=1216#comment-849</guid>
		<description>This book has a discussion of the origins of the lectionary in the synagogue lectionary:  http://tinyurl.com/kpcesm

It&#039;s a small book, but it is very interesting reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book has a discussion of the origins of the lectionary in the synagogue lectionary:  <a href="http://tinyurl.com/kpcesm" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/kpcesm</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a small book, but it is very interesting reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bosco Peters</title>
		<link>http://liturgy.co.nz/lectionary-1/1216#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator>Bosco Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 04:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liturgy.co.nz/blog/?p=1216#comment-811</guid>
		<description>Thanks, James, for your comment anticipating a future part of this blog series. 
No lectionary system is perfect - possibly the&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alibris.co.uk/search/books/qwork/2429018/used/A%20Four%20year%20lectionary.&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Joint Liturgical Group 4 year Lectionary&lt;/a&gt; may be &quot;objectively better&quot;. The three year lectionary, however, is the one that is use by well over half of the world&#039;s Christians. Good luck to anyone trying to convince the many denominations to change :-)
The standard gauge in railway lines may now be realised not to have been the best choice in the 19th century, however, again - good luck to anyone committed to changing well over half the world&#039;s railway systems :-)
The intention of the lectionary is the proclamation of God&#039;s Word in the context of worship Sunday by Sunday, particularly in the Eucharist. There is no intention that this be the only encounter with scripture for Christians. That being said what one person finds what you call a &quot;problematic&quot; passage, another may not. Clearly, because of the context, we do not want to be constantly proclaiming convoluted and obscure texts. But what one finds &quot;problematic&quot; is highly subjective - the lectionary has passed through the hands of many, many thoughtful Christian scholars and is their resulting consensus. I&#039;m committed to it, as is my church which declares it a formulary of our church. Imperfect though it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, James, for your comment anticipating a future part of this blog series.<br />
No lectionary system is perfect &#8211; possibly the<a href="http://www.alibris.co.uk/search/books/qwork/2429018/used/A%20Four%20year%20lectionary." rel="nofollow"> Joint Liturgical Group 4 year Lectionary</a> may be &#8220;objectively better&#8221;. The three year lectionary, however, is the one that is use by well over half of the world&#8217;s Christians. Good luck to anyone trying to convince the many denominations to change <img src='http://liturgy.co.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
The standard gauge in railway lines may now be realised not to have been the best choice in the 19th century, however, again &#8211; good luck to anyone committed to changing well over half the world&#8217;s railway systems <img src='http://liturgy.co.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
The intention of the lectionary is the proclamation of God&#8217;s Word in the context of worship Sunday by Sunday, particularly in the Eucharist. There is no intention that this be the only encounter with scripture for Christians. That being said what one person finds what you call a &#8220;problematic&#8221; passage, another may not. Clearly, because of the context, we do not want to be constantly proclaiming convoluted and obscure texts. But what one finds &#8220;problematic&#8221; is highly subjective &#8211; the lectionary has passed through the hands of many, many thoughtful Christian scholars and is their resulting consensus. I&#8217;m committed to it, as is my church which declares it a formulary of our church. Imperfect though it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Thomas</title>
		<link>http://liturgy.co.nz/lectionary-1/1216#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 04:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liturgy.co.nz/blog/?p=1216#comment-810</guid>
		<description>No one wants to give up the distinctives of his/her own tradition, so the lack of institutional unity remains; I am not a Calvinist and I don&#039;t want to be Presbyterian. But the Common Lectionary promotes church unity in a different way, which everyone can relate to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one wants to give up the distinctives of his/her own tradition, so the lack of institutional unity remains; I am not a Calvinist and I don&#8217;t want to be Presbyterian. But the Common Lectionary promotes church unity in a different way, which everyone can relate to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Moore</title>
		<link>http://liturgy.co.nz/lectionary-1/1216#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>James Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 03:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liturgy.co.nz/blog/?p=1216#comment-809</guid>
		<description>In saying that the RCL is a gift of the Spirit to the church, I would agree.  Of course, as with anything that passes through human hands, it is imperfect.  Too often the lectionary avoids the &quot;problematic&quot; verses in the passages cited, but we&#039;re not slavishly compelled to omit them.
But everything else being equal, it is definitely a good thing to force ourselves into struggling with uncomfortable ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In saying that the RCL is a gift of the Spirit to the church, I would agree.  Of course, as with anything that passes through human hands, it is imperfect.  Too often the lectionary avoids the &#8220;problematic&#8221; verses in the passages cited, but we&#8217;re not slavishly compelled to omit them.<br />
But everything else being equal, it is definitely a good thing to force ourselves into struggling with uncomfortable ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

