Symmetry in the sanctuary
I have tended to take care not to focus excessively on the Anglican Communion Crisis. It has clearly become important, however, that this pre-eminent liturgy blog outlines the issues and informs readers about what has been highlighted by Fr. Montgomery as being what is primarily wrong with the Anglican Communion today: the lack of symmetry in the sanctuary.
Central to this lack of symmetry is the Anglican tradition that the Gospel candle never burns alone. The Gospel candle is the one on the altar on the liturgical North. The other is the Epistle candle. The Gospel candle has normally been lit last and extinguished first. This has resulted in the Gospel candle normally becoming longer than the Epistle candle as it is burning for less time than the Epistle candle.
Confusion entered the liturgy in the bewildering 1960s when priests increasingly started to face the congregation across the altar. Previously, the Gospel candle was the one on the left for everyone. In churches properly orientated the debate was less heated. There one could argue strongly that the Gospel candle was the actual Northern one. But in many others, where the church did not face East, parish committees and even international commissions debated: Was the Gospel candle the one on the priest’s left or on the congregation’s left? Chaos has ensued ever since.
The origin of the concept of a Gospel candle was the Northern Hemisphere proclamation of the Gospel to the heathen North. With the unplanned expansion of the Church of England with the British Empire and beyond, questions arose whether in the Southern Hemisphere this should be reversed and the Gospel candle be the one on the South, or even whether one should agree on the most heathen local area and have the Gospel candle as the one closest to that. Bitter disagreement and impaired communion have been almost inevitable.
Outside of church, the world is increasingly uninterested in which order candles are lit. Inherited legislation about candle lighting is more and more being removed from state regulations so that people are deciding for themselves how to light candles or even whether to light them at all. This acceptance and inclusiveness of variety is part of the new debate. There is even debate whether this is adiaphora or not, particularly with there being no mention of candles in the creeds.
Many are bringing the “world’s” progressive attitudes back into the worshipping community. They are questioning the inherited Anglican tradition and arguing for a revision of the practice. Some are even maintaining that their revisionist position draws on rediscovered and renewed deeper values within the tradition. What has drawn the issue to breaking point for the Communion is that many have moved beyond discussion to actually altering practice.
The Anglican Asymmetrical Altar
Some are lighting both candles at the same time (ACNA – All Candles Now Alight) – arguing that this upholds the tradition in a new contemporary context. FOCAfoca (First on candle always first off candle always) is not arguing about which candle is now the Gospel candle, but wants both candles the same length by first putting out the candle that is lit first, whichever that might be. GAFCON (Gospel Always First Candle On – No!) never lights the Gospel candle first. TEC (Taller Epistle Candlesticks) is possibly the most radical in balancing the look of the length of candles by actually altering the height of the Epistle candlestick. Great confusion is also resulting from another group claiming they are actually the truer Anglican version of TEC. In this case they are Trimming Every Candle. These have within their confederation different approaches to lighting and dousing candles, but compromise by trimming every candle to the same height after each service.
The Anglican Ordinariate follows the Italian practice of using electric candles switched on by a single switch. ACC (All Candles Circulating) keep to the tradition of not having the Gospel candle burn alone, but manage the balancing of heights by swapping the Gospel and Epistle candle after every service. The Sydney Archdiocese is saving money after its financial crisis and being principled in refusing to use candles at all on the communion trolleys from which they administer.
For years now, Anglican primates have refused to celebrate communion together because of the lack of agreement. Bishops have boycotted conferences. The Archbishop of Canterbury has been accused of surreptitiously holding one position privately while maintaining another one publicly. Some think he is playing an extremely complex long game by holding to an improbable solution publicly for so long his private position will finally inevitably triumph. The Archbishop of Canterbury has also reduced membership status on committees of anyone who allows the Gospel candle to burn alone. Their status is reduced from voting to consultant on committees that he controls. Most people cannot see the importance of this, as within the Anglican Communion, these committees actually have no real authority, but are simply consultative in any case.
Within the Church of England it is unclear whether a simple or two-thirds majority is appropriate as a General Synod vote on this issue, and some suggest that it needs an Act of Parliament. In New Zealand, where there is increasing popularity of reversing the order of the Ministry of the Sacrament and the Ministry of the Word, there is now experimentation with lighting the candles at the end of the service and extinguishing them as the service begins. Should any future court cases eventuate over property here, the Act of Parliament that assigns the property to those following the formularies will clearly hand any non-earthquake damaged buildings to the three parishes still following the agreed worship regulations.
It is clearly time to determine the mind of the Anglican Communion on this vexing problem central to the promotion of the orthodox (meaning firstly “right worship”) gospel.
There will be a motion put to Lambeth 2018. A commission of experts has been called. They are working on what will be called the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha Report. After the 2018 Lambeth Conference successfully passes the motion, there will be an international meeting at Brussels of all remaining primates. They will issue a Diet. The Diet of Brussels is anticipated to be a healthy balance to the previous confessional diet.
It is realised and acknowledged by all that Jesus does not specifically mention altar candle lighting order in the Gospels, and that some of the biblical references used to argue both sides may be based on mistranslations, but a hermeneutical hui will be called in Aotearoa-New Zealand to inaugurate a world-wide careful, scholarly examination of the original texts.
Candles are being discussed at every level from international to home Bible study groups. Resources are being produced.
Every significant Anglican budget now has a line to finance meetings, flights, and the production of documents. Sadly, some churches are resorting to the courts of the land as people are border crossing and stealing each other’s candles.
At stake some see that there is nothing less than the dangers of an alternative gospel taking over the life of the church, a gospel in which the divine and human nature of Christ are no longer of equal status. Others argue for a Reformed interpretation of the candle symbolism as alluding to Latimer burning more quickly than Ridley. All sides of the debate are heated and currently there appears to be no consensus.
Calls for a moratorium until a new Communion-wide agreement is reached have been broken on all sides as people say they have no choice but to make decisions about lighting candles in their local context. Meanwhile a proposed Anglican Covenant is being debated but none of its clauses actually deals with the presenting issue of candles.
Thank you, Bosco and Fr. Montgomery, for calling our attention to the REAL crises facing today’s church. 😉
I think that many of the candle issues could be resolved if we used artificial candles filled with liquid paraffin. They do not need to be trimmed. They are always evenly the same height. They can be used with or without followers. And they just need to be refilled on occasion so they do not run out of liquid paraffin during a service.
Yes, David, in some of the discussions I have heard that proposed. There have, however, regularly been howls from some of this being unnatural.
This is exactly what we do.
I’m glad to see that our Anglican sisters and brothers have finally found the critical question at the heart of the Communion Crisis, and are dealing with it so expeditiously. (I am a Lutheran from Canada)
Huh?
Or how about finding a congregation that doesn’t care one way or another about candles and focuses instead on worship, prayer and teaching of the Word?
Yes, Adulcia, in some sense that might be how the Sydney Archdiocese articulates their position (see above), and they have a surprisingly strong voice in the Anglican Communion. But even their position isn’t “not caring one way or another” – it is closer to a “no candles” position. Remember it is not really that long ago that it was legislated that candles could not be placed on the altar (communion trolley) and so some Anglicans used to put a shelf above the altar/communion trolley to hold candles legally. Sydney would look back to those days. Some churches in Sydney have glassed cabinets as you come into the building, with candles in them to remind worshippers what others in the Anglican Communion take for granted. Not using candles, the new issue in Sydney is the debate about electric lighting: can you use coloured lighting at services? This has its own dangers in churches there that use violet lighting during Advent; white, gold, or “best” lighting at Christmas and so on. But that is a whole other blog post.
Bosco – you are superb.
1: How come you know so much stuff??
2: How can you keep your tongue in your cheek long enough to write it?
3: Perhaps a FB page for the very interesting Southern Hemisphere option of LCAEAEAB or put another way, ‘How many angels can dance on a candlestick before the Communion collapses?’
4: I always go for the ‘light as many as you can approach’ to avoid the problem (or subvert the whole system) but then I would do that wouldn’t I!
Thank you for this, Bosco. It reminds me of the remarks our Bishop Beisner made recently when introducing Bishop Lloyd Allen of Honduras where parishioners are dealing with how to feed themselves, get clean water, access to education, and adequate health care. He quoted Bishop Allen of saying something to the effect that if the good people of the Anglican Communion are arguing over sex, we have way too much time on our hands!
Once again, thank you for putting the whole thing in perspective so brilliantly.
At first I thought, “this can’t be real”. Then I realized it was all too real. Sadly my church and 6 others are being sued by the diocese for leaving over “candle” issues and aligning themselves with the more orthodox (biblical) view. We are still in the Anglican Communion and seek the advancement of the cause of Christ in all things.
Doesn’t seem that this is really the worst problem facing the Anglican Communion, by a country mile.
I think that some folks have a hard time understanding that you are not always serious all of the time Padre!
As for the artificial candles with liquid paraffin, it is not the first time that I have been confronted with the fact that something in my life was considered unnatural.
David, I think Peter Ustinov said it well: “Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious.” It always intrigues me that people retell some of Jesus’ best jokes with such a serious face. And, hence, totally miss the point. As for your suggestion of the liquid paraffin kind, I think by now you realise that, though I personally prefer a good quality beeswax candle, I am fine with those who tend to prefer the liquid paraffin kind.
Unfortunately, I just do not feel drawn to beeswax candles. But I have many friends, in fact, really some of my best friends, rave about beeswax candles. But I am relived to know that just because my preference is liquid paraffin candles that it is not a difference, especially not a difference on a core issue, that would not allow us to share table service.
Bosco, Bosco, Bosco., I have no idea how they train you kiwis, but you have it all wrong! :0)
The “Epistle” side is the side the lecturn is on (as opposed to the pulpit). This should be on the right (if you stand facing the altar). Obviously, this is where the Epistle (and other lessons) are read from.
Some churches (not many) read the gospel from just left of centre (i.e. other side of the church). Hence the “Gospel” side.
The theory for lighting the Epistle candle first is something about the gospel can’t stand alone with out the epistles – which is just silly as the gospels happened first (although the epistles were written first (well Paul’s letters were anyway (or is that gonna start another debate 🙂
However there is (gasp) another valid theory (one which my local Cathedral uses). I have had it out with the Diocesan Oracle (I won’t mention she’s a priest (a Bishop called her the Oracle and so they must be right 🙂 and I think I prefer her version.
LET THE LIGHT OF THE GOSPEL SHINE BEFORE ALL!
… which sadly is the bit most people forget is more important than a lot of this extra stuff which is all fluff based on tradition and local customs, and in the end, doesn’t really matter.
One fears that the Diet of Brussels may cause a holy wind of sufficient strength to extinguish any candles in close proximity, therefore rendering the whole “lopsided candle” issue a moot point. Not unlike, I suppose, GAFCON’s rejection of the Anglican Covenant…
But what about those communities that do not even put candles in candle-holders, but instead mount candles on top of other candles and call it proper?
Hilarious! Candles do not cause such an uproar in rural USA, but don’t even think about asymetrical flower arrangements, or even worse flowers taken OFF the table and put in flower stands, thereby making room on the table for the bread and wine.
Then there’s the provocative action of the parish priest declaring that the font is not a vase for the flowers.
Those young in the faith will just see us talking about trifles, but it is important to learn to deal with issues that may seem silly. The thought of eating food sacrificed to idols probably seems silly and irrelevant to us now, but the way the young church dealt with it is very valuable. For example: the Salvation Army quickly got its collective head around the place of women in ministry, and then got on with the job. Anglicans could learn from them and extrapolate to greater problems, and save endless meetings into the small hours, burning both candles at ends.
Otherwise, how are we going to tell those young in the faith that they have to have a diet of Brussels? It won’t go down well. It will be likened to the diet of Worms. Will they look forwards to trifles afterwards?
I love candles! The more candles, the better, I say!
Sadly, I suspect the day might come when all candles are banished because of their contribution to Climate Change. We’ll be just left with a memory of a distant flickering flame.
In the meantime I intend to appreciate the candles we have while we still have them. Virtual candles are all well and good, but will never be quite the same.
On the subject of candles:
http://drybonesblog.blogspot.com/2010/12/eighth-night.html
Happy Chanukah everyone.
Thanks, Adulcia. I hope you saw my post on that.
Congratulations, a blog of devastating clarity and insight. Does the ABC read your blog? I’m sure that he would find it most enlightening!
Thanks, Caro. I am not sure if the Archbishop of Canterbury himself reads my site, but I do know that at least one of his staff has visited here.
Howl!
We actually had a mini-crisis when our last parish administrator demanded that there be no real candles on Christmas eve due to the potential fire hazard. The crisis was solved when
a. the insurance rep said that her congregation used real candles, and hand helds on Christmas eve, and
b.said administrator found a new position.