web analytics

lectionary delays missal?

missal1This starts with a bit that some people will take for granted, and for others this may be new: when Roman Catholic clergy hear or use the word, “missal”, they think of the book with the regularly used, fixed parts of the Mass, and the varying prayers etc. for specific days. They do not think of the readings, which they think of as being in another book they call the “lectionary”. But when Roman Catholic lay people hear or use the word, “missal” they (mostly) think of a book many of them own which has the readings, the prayers, and the Mass parts, and often some of the sacramental and other rites, offices, and prayers. So many devout lay people own a “Sunday Missal” (with the Sunday readings in full) and a “Weekday Missal” (with the weekday readings in full).

When the Roman Catholic Church speaks of a revised translation of the missal, they are not talking about what the lay people mean.

Now you might think that, with all the emphasis on getting the English missal (clery style) translation exactly the same from Kenya to Kentucky, that lay-people’s missals are identical also all over the English-speaking world. You would be wrong. Readings in Canada are from the NRSV, in USA they are from the New American Bible, and in England they are from the Jerusalem Bible. And the Vatican doesn’t like NRSV (same reason that it didn’t like the first English translation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church).

Well there is a new Grail Psalter. But no new English translation of the Bible. Yet. So in NZ, it will be new Mass responses this year, new priest’s Mass parts probably next year, and then… some time… a new “lectionary” and then there can be new people’s missals.

While work on the revised English translation of the Missal is drawing to a close, the process of producing a new Lectionary for Mass continues.

The Lectionary is a book containing the extracts which have been selected from the bible for use in public worship. The selection of extracts will remain the same but a more accurate and contemporary translation of the scriptures will replace the Jerusalem Bible translation used in the current Lectionary.

The International Commission for the Preparation of an English-language Lectionary (ICPEL) was formed in 2003 to arrange for a new Lectionary for Britain and Ireland, Australia and New Zealand, and other countries who wished to be included. It was hoped to use the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible (NRSV) and a new version of the Grail Psalms.

Canadians had been reading the NRSV at Mass since 1992, when the first edition of the new Sunday Lectionary was published with approval from the Vatican Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments. It was only when the Canadian NRSV Lectionary for weekdays was published in 1994 that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith objected to NRSV translations. Interestingly, Pope John Paul II used the Canadian Lectionary at World Youth Day in Toronto in 2002.

After many years of often divisive debate, the Vatican finally granted recognitio of the Canadian Lectionary in 2007. It was hoped that other countries could piggy-back this version and have a new Lectionary ready for simultaneous release with the revised Missal. However, the response of the Holy See so far has been negative and it is now highly unlikely that a Lectionary will be ready for joint publication with the Missal translation. This creates problems for the publishers of people’s missals which usually include Mass texts and readings.

The NRSV bible translation, first published in 1989, is the best choice for a Lectionary because it is scholarly, ecumenical and widely used. It stands out among the many translations of the bible because it is “as literal as possible” in adhering to the ancient texts. It draws on recently available sources that increase our understanding of many previously obscure biblical passages.

The NRSV is an authorised revision of the Revised Standard Version which was published in 1952 and gained the distinction of being officially authorised for use by all major Christian churches: Protestant, Anglican, Roman Catholic, and Eastern Orthodox.

During the nearly 60 years since the publication of the RSV, many in the churches have become sensitive to the exclusively masculine-oriented language of the translation. The mandate for the revision of the RSV specified that such language be eliminated where it could be done without distorting the meaning of the text.

The NRSV therefore uses inclusive language for people, so that the readings do not refer to everyone as ‘brothers’, ‘sons’, ‘men’, etc as the current Jerusalem translation does. Male pronouns have been retained in references to God.

The NRSV is intended for use in public worship as well as in private study. The editors have tried to put the message of the Scriptures in simple, enduring words and expressions that are worthy to stand in the great tradition of the King James Bible and its predecessors.


Similar Posts:

9 thoughts on “lectionary delays missal?”

    1. Thanks, Fr Jay! So Extraordinary clergy missals are like Ordinary lay missals – and Ordinary clergy missals are not like Extraordinary lay missals. Got it. Extraordinary!

  1. For those who haven’t been following these things, why doesn’t the Roman Catholic church like the NRSV, or indeed the English translation of the Catechism?

    1. Unfortunately, Robert, the Vatican hasn’t given reasons, as far as I am aware (happy to be corrected). There is a pattern though. The 1998 ICEL translation of the missal, approved by all English-speaking bishop conferences, the first English translation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, and the NRSV all panned by the Vatican, all use the convention of using contemporary gender-inclusive language where it is clear the original intended to be inclusive of both genders. The Vatican has demanded that words like “…for us men and for our salvation…” be the English translation. I am a strong advocate for reading the scriptures as much as possible in the original and provide tools to help those who struggle with that. I think the NRSV is a good start for those who cannot access the original. I would have gone further than NRSV in some places, eg. I would have distinguished the earth creature of Gen 2:7 linguistically, as the original does, from the (ish) man later in the same chapter – and think some of the point of the story is lost in not having this distinction.

  2. Dear Sir / Mam ,
    It is really privileged for me to write to your ministry and I pray may Lord bless you abundantly. I am shahid naveed from Pakistan . Five years before I accepted Jesus Christ as my personal Savior and I trust in Him as my rock and try to walk in Him, as the Word of God says don’t be lazy in struggle.
    As I was visiting your site I found that you are doing the work of translation into native languages. I am able to translate the good stuff of you into my native language Punjabi and national language Urdu. There are two purposes to request you the first one are to know the Word of God more deeply and second one to be supportive my family and to run. our Ministry. We will also teach your stuff in our working areas with our people .
    My suggestion for you is to create your material in my language of Urdu and Punjabi also. It will bring lots of blessings of the Word of God for the Pakistani and Indian Urdu and Punjabi speaking people. For that purpose I as a translator will bring your material into Urdu languages and into Punjabi language as well. Although it will take your low expenses as well, as fund for the Word of God to reach out to the deserving people. As a translator I will take the expenses that will be spending just for the Word. I will be looking for your kind words on this my humble request as soon as possible.
    “There is nothing more precious than to read and listen the Word of God into your own language.”
    I hope you will consider me regarding this request.
    In Jesus,


    Mobile no, 92-3477871319

  3. Rev Victor Zinkuratire, SSS

    There has been a lot of uncertainty regarding the new English Lectionary, but the above comments have somehow clarified the situation. So, is it now certain that the Paulines are going to publish a lectionary for Anglophone Africa based on the RSV (2nd Catholic Edition)?
    Will they use the same translation for their other two editions,i.e. Sunday Missal and Daily Missal? We are eagerly waiting for these lectionaries and Missals.

  4. The NRSV is a lot better than the NAB. Any translation is better than the NAB. The NAB just makes stuff up. Like in the reading of Sirach 15 for this upcoming Sunday (Feb 16th 2014) the NAB replaces “to act faithfully is within your power” (I know this is the real reading since its in the Greek text) with “They will save you” (referring to the commandments). That’s insane!!!!!!!!!!!! RSV had it right. Why did they even make the crappy NAB?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.