web analytics
Reuse Liturgy Sml

Reuse Liturgy?

Reuse Liturgy

I was recently pointed to a helpful article by The Revd Philip Welsh, a retired priest in the diocese of London. The Church of England has moved from a single worship book (Book of Common Prayer; Alternative Service Book) to a shelf of books with, within each, a raft of options, templates, and patterns.

The article describes how, often, one arrives at a church service with not the slightest idea what one will encounter, and one is handed a newly-printed booklet (for that service and that service alone) of what lies ahead. And it’s not much different here in New Zealand Anglicanism – only one is not limited by a shelf of authorised rites. Services from anywhere around the globe can be pressed into use – and if that isn’t enough, people make up stuff locally – or as they go along. If you haven’t been given a newly-printed service booklet, only when the slide is projected onto the screen do you know what you are about to pray, profess, or sing.

Rather than declaring at worship that life is about worship, this approach embodies the belief that life is basically about entertainment, and entertainment is about things constantly being different. In a world (and church) seeking to reuse, recycle, and reduce, this is a waste of trees. And it has moved all power from the community to the leader.

Changing words do, indeed, hold the attention of the worshipper, but what they hold attention to is not the object of our worship but the pamphlet in our hands. We are not so much taking our place in worship as finding our place on the page. There is little chance for words to become known by heart, and held as part of corporate memory: the words in which we worship have moved outside us. The irony is that the Preface to Common Worship eloquently voices this concern: “It is when the framework of worship is clear and familiar and the texts are known by heart that the poetry of praise and the passion of prayer can transcend the printed word.” It would be a brave vicar who put that to the test…

It is as if the gains of the Reformation have been put into reverse. The 16th-century print revolution helped to drive the Reformation, as wider possession of prayer-books and Bibles underwrote a wider sense of ownership as church members. It seems that the 20th-century print revolution, with all the possibilities of desktop publishing, is in danger of turning it back.

Worship should be real – words intended to be addressed to each other (assembly to presider) should be addressed to each other, not to the booklet in our hands or the screen over to our right. That’s being lost.

Worship is primarily action – not words. That’s being lost.

Worship is a shared language – prayer books should be more descriptive than prescriptive. That’s being lost.

And worship is common prayer. That’s being lost.

Read the whole article.

What do you think?

If you appreciated this post, do remember to like the liturgy facebook page, use the RSS feed, and sign up for a not-very-often email, …

image source

Similar Posts:

8 thoughts on “Reuse Liturgy?”

  1. For people with sight deficit constantly changing services means that they are often “lost” and unsure of the flow of a Service the regular flow of the Prayer Book allows one to participate

    1. Thanks, Lynette – I think this is such an important point! Similarly, powerpoint on screens doesn’t work for all… Blessings.

  2. An an Anglican and Reader, our training is focused on using all of these resources. And it makes sense when leading services outside the church building, perhaps with people with little or no experience of worship to stretch the boundaries to make language more inclusive. And the same applies in some forms of services in church, but the familiar forms of both BCP and CW in our context are held in seasonal booklets, which provide opportunities for people to get to know the form of service and the responses and to reflect on what they are praying and saying when participating in worship.

    This format has worked for us for around 10 years and people expect the familiar, not the unexpected.

    We do produce one-off orders of service, but these are rare and normally for a specific occasion.

    I have experienced the throwaway liturgy that is described in the article, but know that it’s horses for courses. What suits us in our context, might not suit others in their context.

    Off course, with a new incumbent due, things could change, but hopefully not to suddenly or outrageously to alienate anyone who worships with us.

    1. Thanks, Ernie. I am a strong advocate of making the seasons feel different – and also of some variety within the constants. I also advocate strongly for ways to help visitors and new people feel welcome. You are describing good ways to do these things. Blessings.

  3. Patricia Gibson

    It is the Book of COMMON Prayer where we the People in communion with each other share these COMMON prayers together in worship. We say these words together in joy, in grief, in fear, in thanksgiving, in comfort. When otherwise words fail us we say these words, engraved in our hearts, knowing the next words when our eyes fail us. These beloved words unite us in the COMMON worship of our beloved Jesus Christ – no matter what in what language we worship, we pray from our Book of COMMON Prayer.

    1. Thanks, Patricia. For readers beyond USA (I’m presuming, Patricia, that’s where you are), Patricia is talking about The Episcopal Church’s current prayer book (not the 17th Century book that many/most readers think of when they see “BCP”). I think your point is really important – so many have lost this sense of shared, community prayer. And of praying “by heart”. Blessings.

  4. Is it just me, or does the priest in the illustration bear more than a little resemblance to you Father B?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.