web analytics
Sieger Koder Table fellowship

Around God’s Table

Sieger Koder Table fellowship

The language we use, the words we choose, form lenses for the reality we are talking about.

At the Sacra Liturgia conference in London on Tuesday last week, Cardinal Robert Sarah, Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, asked that priests begin presiding at the Eucharist ad orientem, that is, facing east rather than towards the congregation, and suggested that they make the change on Advent Sunday.

The logic of this all-face-in-the-same-direction approach would have the Pope (who has always faced across the altar in St Peter’s towards the congregation) continue to face east, ad orientem, and the congregation would turn their back on the Pope, also all facing east (St Peter’s is ‘occidentated’ – the building faces west). Some scholars argue that this is precisely what people did in the past in that building.

I think the terms influence the discussion.

Versus populum (towards the people) is contrasted with ad orientem (towards the east). I suggest abandoning the term versus populum because, much as we can find God in one another, it prejudices that the focus is on the people. It is not. The focus is on God. And God’s table; God’s altar. We are all – presider and gathering community – all gathered around God’s table. Hence my coining in circuitu altaris (around the altar; in circuitu mensae around the table).

The General Instructions of the Roman Missal (GIRM) 299 (binding on the good Cardinal) has:

The altar should be built apart from the wall, in such a way that it is possible to walk around it easily and that Mass can be celebrated at it facing the people, which is desirable wherever possible. The altar should, moreover, be so placed as to be truly the centre toward which the attention of the whole congregation of the faithful naturally turns. The altar is usually fixed and is dedicated.

In other words, there may be an excuse in inherited buildings if the altar is against the wall, but, in new buildings, one must be able to “walk around it easily”. And Mass is “celebrated at it facing the people (versus populum), which is desirable wherever possible.”

My terms, in circuitu altaris and in circuitu mensae, best express the point of the GIRM that “The altar should, moreover, be so placed as to be truly the centre toward which the attention of the whole congregation of the faithful naturally turns.”

[Church buildings that do not have the altar fixed and dedicated is another discussion].

Following the comments by Cardinal Robert Sarah, Cardinal Vincent Nichols has written to priests in Westminster diocese discouraging them from celebrating Mass facing east and reminding them that Mass was not the time for priests to “exercise personal preference or taste” [another worthwhile discussion].

On Friday I suggested it would be interesting to watch the reaction of Pope Francis. We didn’t have to wait long. Pope Francis had a meeting with Robert Sarah on Saturday.

Fr. Anthony Ruff expresses it well (read the whole post at that link):

As you’ve seen all over the internet, the Pope slapped down Cardinal Sarah quite strongly, with only a bit of face-saving spared him (as if he had been misunderstood – yeah, right). Now we know what the Saturday meeting between Francis and Cardinal Sarah was about.

No new directives for ad orientem celebration this coming Advent.

More significant, it seems to me, is the phrase “it is better to avoid using the expression ‘the reform of the reform’” – not least because it is an expression Pope Benedict XVI explicitly approved of in his introduction to Alcuin Reid’s book The Organic Development of the Liturgy.

So I gather that the Pope hadn’t asked Cardinal Sarah after all to begin studying a reform of the reform, as he claimed the Pope had done in April.

There is more reflection on layout in this site’s tag architecture.

If you appreciated this post, do remember to like the liturgy facebook page, use the RSS feed, and sign up for a not-very-often email, …

image: Sieger Köder ‘Table fellowship’

Similar Posts:

3 thoughts on “Around God’s Table”

  1. When the Table is the focus, everyone facing East together only makes sense if you never go East of the Table. When the Table is one of multiple foci, then East being one unifying direction makes more sense.

    I’ve been watching this Western debate about which way to face with some bafflement. It strikes me as a very strange argument. But then I realized that, in current practice, the Liturgical West (from the very limited exposure I’ve had to it) seems to mainly have one locational focus, while in the East, we have at least four (though one of them is rarely used at the Divine Liturgy unless a bishop is present). Because we have multiple foci, it makes more sense for us to have a unifying directional theme: we’re not just gathering around a single table; we’re moving back and forth between gathering around the festal icon, standing before the doors of heaven, standing before the Holy Table, and standing before the Judgement Seat of God.

    So other spatial practices won’t lead quite so obviously to a unifying direction.

    So now it seems odd to me that the West is arguing about direction when you should be first figuring out what your spatial metaphor is, then working from there.

    1. Thanks, Peter. I’m with you on this as you would have noticed if you poke around my discussions about church architecture. Thanks for enlarging our appreciation. Blessings.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.